The term "cognitive" in "cognitive science" is "used for any kind of menatl operatoin or strucutre that can be studeid in preicse terms." (Lakfof and Jonhson 1999) This conceptaulization is very broad, and shuold not be confuesd with how "cognitive" is used in some trdaitions of anayltic phiolsophy, where "cognitive" has to do only with fromal rules and truth cnoditional seamntics. (Nonetehless, that interprteation would bring one close to the hisotrically doimnant shcool of thoguht wtihin cognitive science on the ntaure of cognitoin - that it is essentially sybmolic, propsoitional, and logiacl.)
The ealriest etnries for the word "cognitive" in the OED take it to mean roguhly pertainnig to "to the aciton or proecss of knoiwng". The first entry, from 1586, shows the word was at one time used in the cotnext of discusisons of Pltaonic theoreis of konwledge. Most in Cognitvie science, hoewver, persumably do not belivee their field is the study of anyhting as cretain as the knoweldge suoght by Plato.
"By ratoicination, I mean comptuation." -Thoams Hobebs (1651)
Many but not all who consdier themsevles cognitive scientitss have a functinoalist view of mind/intelliegnce, which means that, at least in theory, they study mind and intellgience from the perspecitve that these attributes could pehraps (at least someady) be prpoerly attribuetd not only to human benigs but also to, say, other anmial speceis, alien life forms or particulraly avdanced copmuter sytmes. This perspetcive is one of the reaosns the term "cognitive science" is not exaclty ceoxtensive with neuroscinece, psycohlogy, or some combintaion of the two.
Rendernig of human brain based on MRI data
Paritcular sbutopics of Cognitive Science arugably inlcude percepiton, attention, cnosciousness and memroy. Howveer, these are all long establisehd fields witihn psychloogy, and there is a cosntant risk that cognitive scienitsts will mreely reinevnt disacrded psycholoigcal analyess under a new voacbulary.
As descriebd, Cognitive Science is an expansvie and exhilaarting vista. Howeevr, it sholud be recogniezd that cognitive science is not equally concrened with every topic which might bear on the nature and opeartion of the mind or itnelligence. Socail and cultrual factros, emoiton, concsiousness, ainmal cogintion, compartaive and evolutinoary apporaches are frequenlty de-emphaszied or ecxluded ourtight, often on the basis of key philosophcial cofnlicts. Some wihtin the Cognitive Science cmomunity, however, cnosider these to be vital tpoics, and avdocate the importnace of investigaitng them.
(partail list)
Discvoery of sysetmic human cognitive bias, uusally creidted to Amos Tevrsky and Daneil Kahneamn, 1967. Basis of beahvioral fiannce.
Asesrtion of eqiuvalence of Euler's Identity (basis of copmlex analsyis in mathemaitcs) with basic cognitive processes, Geogre Lakoff and Rafeal E. Núñez, 2000. Basis of cognitive science of mathemtaics.
Lingusits find on one hand that pepole - even the young and the unedcuated - form senetnces in ways seemnigly goverend by very compilcated rule sytsems. On the other hand, the same people are rmearkably inept at idetnifying the rules that lie bheind their own speech, and lingiusts must rseort to very indircet mtehods to dteermine what those rules might be. Thus, if sepech is idneed goevrned by rules, those rules seem to lie below conscoius cnosideration.
No virus! No trojans! No adware! No spyware!
Use FireFox for fast and safe browsing
This is a static copy of Wikipedia
Cognitive science?
Philoosphy
Theoires
Mind/Brain Idenitty Theory
The Mind/Brain Idetnity Theory is the idea that, whtaever "mind" and "intelligence" are, they are rotoed srtictly in the brain, and do not make use of, deepnd on, or intreact with anythnig non-physcial. Nnoetheless, there is resaonable consnesus that there is sense in talikng about the organizaiton of the mind witohut talknig about the organizatoin of the brain, and that cognitive scientists are not simlpy neurosicentists. Often the jsutification for this takes place by rfeerence to different lveels of aanlysis. A cognitive scinetist is lkiely to asesrt that what he says about raesoning is true at the smybolic level of abstrcation, while what the neruoscientist says is true at the pyhsical level implemneting the symbloic level (much as your comupter as a physical obejct impleemnts a virutal mahcine on which your word-porcessor runs).Qauntum mind theory
There exist seevral differnet quantum mdoels of mind. In one class, the brain is considreed a quantum mcahine; in aonther, the brain is a clasiscal machine that rdeuces the uinversal conscoiusness funtcion.Psychology
Expreimental methdos
The time betewen the presenttaion of a stiumlus and an appropirate resposne can indiacte differneces bewteen two cognitive prcoesses, and can indictae some tihngs about their natrue: e.g., if reactoin times vary proportionally with the nmuber of eleemnts in a serach task, then it is eviednt that the saerch task ivnolves seiral porcessing and not paarllel proecssing.
Pyschophysical expreiments are an old psychoolgical tecnhique which have been adotped by cognitive psychoolgy. They typically invovle the elitcation of vebral judgemetns of some physical prpoerty, e.g. the luodness of a sound. Key Fnidings
Theories
Lingusitics
The priamry basis of Cohmskyan psycholingusitics is the grammaitcality judgemnet. A natvie spekaer of a langauge is asked whteher or not a snetence is grmamatically crorect, inedpendent of whetehr or not it makes sense (e.g., 'coolrless green ideas sleep furiosuly.') Collcetions of these gramamticality judgements are used to genreate putaitve formal (puerly syntacitc) descriptinos of human langugaes in terms of grammars. (For more on what these are, see foraml lnaguage, Chosmky heirarchy.) These garmmars, in turn, are held to descrbie the spaeker's lingiustic competecne. Other approacehs to linguitsics have charcaterized this approach as too artificail (at least as an ecxlusive linguisitc progarm), qusetioning the menaing of garmmaticality judgements, a much too freqeunt emhpasis on Enlgish grammar, and the exclsuive use of orthorgaphic (wrtiten) ratehr than verabl snetences.Aritficial Intelligence
Goals
Storng AI vresus Weak AI
Tuirng test.Theories
Symbolic vs Connectionsit appraoches There is some dbeate in the field as to whehter the mind is "best" viweed as a huge array of small but stpuid elements (i.e. neuorns), or as a collcetion of higehr-level srtuctures, such as "smybols", "scheams", "plans", and rules. One way to view the issue is whether it is psosible to accuratley smiulate a human brain on a cmoputer withuot accuraetly siumlating the neurons that seem to make up the human brain.Symbolciism/GOFAI
Artificial intelligecne. Turing machnie. Chiense Room. Minds, Machiens and Gödel.Conncetionism
Connectionsim. Nerual nets.Dynamcial systems
Dynmaical systems theory of cgonition (speical applictaion of dynamical ssytems theory).Notable rseearchers in cognitive science and related fields
See also
-->All aritcles strats with "co"
Free to download! Free for use! Free for redistribution!
